new banner

Services of Scenic Solutions
Completed landscape projects
Papers and Presentations
Beautiful landscapes
Australian and International studies of landscape quality
The science of scenery
Landscape miscellany
Landscape resources
About Dr Andrew Lothian
Contact us
Site map

South Australia's coast

Port McDonnell
Port McDonnell

Cape Northumberland
Cape Northumberland

Carpenter Rocks
Carpenter Rocks


Robe coast
Robe coast

Guichen Bay
Guichen Bay

90 mile beach
90 mile Beach

Port Elliot
Port Elliot

The Bluff, Encounter Bay
The Bluff, Encounter Bay

Petrel Cove, Kings Head
Petrel Cove, Kings Beach

Newland Head
Newland Head

Waitpinga Beach

Parsons Beach
Parsons Beach

Tunkalilla Beach

Deep Creek
Deep Creek & Kangaroo Island

Deep Creek
Deep Creek

Campbell Ck
Campbell Ck & Kangaroo Island

Pennington Bay
Pennington Bay, Kangaroo Island

American River
American River, KI

Emu Bay
Emu Bay, KI

Cape Cassini
Cape Cassini, KI

Snelling Beach
Snelling Beach, KI

Cape Torrens
Cape Torrens, KI

West Bay KI
West Bay, KI

Maupertuis Bay
Maupertuis Bay, KI

Cape du Couedic
Cape du Couedic, KI

Hanson Bay
Hanson Bay, KI

Vivonne Bay
Vivonne Bay, KI

Bales Bay
Bales Bay, KI

Antechamber Bay
Antechamber Bay, KI

Lady Bay, FP
Lady Bay, Fleurieu Peninsula

Sellicks Beach, FP

Maslins Beach
Maslins Beach, FP

 Onkaparinga River
Onkaparinga River mouth

Marino, Hallett Cove

Seacliff, Adelaide coast


Adelaide coast






Why is it that certain landscapes appeal to us? What is it about landscapes that convey attraction, beauty, interest, even love of a scene? Is there something inherent in the landscape that appeals or is it something in us which responds to the landscape? Does the appeal of landscapes lie before or behind our eyes?

Click on the topics below:

What is landscape quality?
Where do landscapes fit in aesthetics?
The meaning of the word landscape
Are scenic resources worth looking after?
Love of landscape - Changing attitudes to the Australian landscape

It was an exquisite day. It was one of those days so clear, so still, so silent, you almost feel the earth itself has stopped in astonishment at its own beauty.
Katherine Mansfield, 1922. On the Marlborough Sounds (New Zealand).
What is landscape quality?

It is a subjective quality but it can be objectively measured

It is commonly believed that as "beauty lies in the eyes of the beholder", scenic quality is a subjective quality it is not possible to objectively measure and understand it.

Subjectivity is defined by the dictionary as deriving from perceiving a subject whereas objectivity refers to real or external things, “uncoloured by feelings or opinions” (Concise Oxford Dictionary).

Because landscape quality derives from our senses, our perceptions, it is inherently subjective. However this does not mean that it cannot be measured and understood objectively.

It is a public good, not privately owned

A beautiful scene is like other environmental goods such as air, wind, water and biodiversity – it is a public good, not owned by any one person. Because of this it does not enter the market place as a commodity except where it benefits a property.

People own property and often these are located so as to gain the advantage of a beautiful view. The value of their property will reflect this view and the value the community place upon it. This may be 10 – 15% of the property value. However they do not own the view – only the right to view it from a particular vantage point.

It is not diminished by use

Like air, water or the wind, landscape quality can be viewed by many people but this is non-consumptive, it does not diminish the total stock in any way. Niagara Falls have been viewed by countless people but it continues to pour over the ledge undiminished by this viewing.

Barron Falls near Cairns

This contrasts with many resources such as minerals, fish and soils which can be diminished by use, or, in the case of soils, by erosion. Views can be affected by air pollution which hangs over cities and sometimes drifts over scenic areas.

It can be changed but is never destroyed

As a perceptual quality, landscape quality exists even in a small degree in every landscape. It may be degraded through abuse such as erosion, pollution or scaring by quarrying but a certain measure of quality remains.

Lake Frome gibber plain

Landscapes comprising flat gibber plains in arid Australia which are characterised as having no variation in terrain, being barren without trees or other land cover, with no land use, with uniform colour and texture, still average 2 – 3 on a 10 point scale of landscape quality, indeed some people rate them as 10 as they are quite striking landscapes in their own right.

Top of next column

It is a qualitative resource and is therefore dependent of human perception

A qualitative resource contrasts with a quantitative resource which can be measured by conventional means – e.g. length, breadth, depth. A qualitative resource can only be measured by people assessing its quality.

Admiring the view, Queenstown, New Zealand

It exists whether or not the area is accessible for viewing

Environmental economics asserts that some environmental features such as whales and Antarctica have existence value: people are willing to contribute to their preservation even though they do not expect to necessarily see them personally. The same concept applies to landscape: their worth is not necessarily dependent on people viewing them.

The conventional wisdom is that if an area can’t be seen, it does not matter whether it is degraded. Thus a quarry or a wind farm might be justified on the basis that no one will see it.

However, we do not know today what access to the site there may be in the future and that people may view it even today by a variety of means – walking, jogging, mountain bikes, hang gliding, flying, by boat (if near coast); not just by cars.

There are areas such as the Bungle Bungles in north-west Australia which were virtually unknown to anyone but the locals until 1983. Now the area is visited and appreciated by many people and many more have seen photographs of it in calendars, magazines and books.

Bungle Bungles (Purnululu National Park) Photo:

Extrapolating the argument (that an area has to be seen to be valued) to other environmental resources such as biodiversity implies that we should not look after these if no one can benefit from viewing or visiting them. Clearly this is not the case – they are worthy of conservation in their own right, regardless of any direct or immediate benefit that we humans derive from them. So it should be with scenic resources.

Landscape resources are an environmental resource of immense community value

Soil, land, water, biodiversity, wilderness, and heritage features are regarded as environmental resources that the community treasures. Landscape quality is also an environmental resource equally valued by the community as worth looking after.

Adelaide's Hills Face Zone - backdrop to the city


Go to top

Where do landscapes fit in aesthetics?

Aesthetics taxonomy

The diagram illustrates a taxonomy of aesthetics that differentiates natural and human objects. The taxonomy provides a context for landscape aesthetics which fall under natural objects. However often landscapes combine both natural objects and objects created by people such as houses, roads, signs etc.

Natural objects cover the natural environment, human forms (and animal forms) and landscapes. However while each of these are natural in origin (i.e. the basis of their aesthetic attractiveness is not human created), each has been modified by human influence - e.g. although human forms are natural, women's magazines emphasise the use of beauty aids.

The aesthetics of human creation covers tangible objects and conceptual phenomena such as music, literature and even mathematics. Objects include landscaped gardens, such as those created by Capability Brown in England in the 18th century. These gardens are often regarded, through human ingenuity, as of a natural appearance, thus providing a bridge between the two main categories of nature and human creation. It is as if the highest form of artificial creation is to appear natural. 

Wherever and whenever and whomever you see real beauty, it produces a sense of awe and reverence. As it does in music and literature. And, yes, in landscape. Phillip Adams, 2010

Go to top


Landscape. The very word conjures up images in our mind of past scenes enjoyed, of encounters with the physical world, of sunsets admired, of childhood memories of idealised and romantic scenes of storybook castles on high rocky pinnacles, dark forests and placid streams meandering amidst grassy meadows.



Consultation with dictionaries suggests two broad meanings of the term "landscape";

  1. A view or a prospect of inland scenery that can be compre-hended from a single viewpoint
  2. A picture or sketch of the same.

Interestingly, the definition excludes the sea but dictionaries are silent on whether it excludes rivers and lakes as well on the basis that these features are not landscape but waterscape.

Newland Head

Towards Newland Head, near Victor Harbor

Significantly the definition combines both the physical scene and the viewer who sees it, the viewer defining from their viewpoint that portion of the entire scene that comprises the landscape. The viewer may also render an interpretation of what they see in the form of a picture, thereby providing a record of the landscape from that position.

The second definition does not include photographs which can be used to interpret the landscape. The definition thus includes both the perception and interpretation of the landscape.

The term landscape here has the above meaning but with the inclusion of water, whether in the form of a river, lake or the sea. The only proviso being that the land should provide the visible context for the water; i.e. a scene of the sea or a lake without land being visible would not be considered to be a landscape. The inclusion of land, however, regardless of its extent in the scene, will be sufficient for it to be considered landscape.

Scenic quality derives from the term scenery which has its origins in theatre as the backdrop to a play. With its roots in the theatre where scene describes a portion of a play, so a scene can describe a portion of a landscape. Scenery, which describes the decorative backdrops used on a stage, also refers to the general appearance of a place, particularly a picturesque view.

In recent years, scenic quality has become interchangeable term with landscape quality. This is particularly the case in North America where scenic quality is the usual term rather than landscape quality.

Tall trees

Origins of landscape

The etymology of the term landscape has been researched extensively in the literature.

It is believed that the terms landskift, landscipe or landscaef entered Britain some time after the 5th century. These terms referred to a system of human-made spaces in the land - spaces such as fields with boundaries though not necessarily defined by fences or walls. It also referred to a natural unit, a region or tract of land such as a river valley or range of hills as occupied by a tribe or later, ruled by a feudal lord.

The term is similar in meaning to the German landschaft referring to a small administrative unit or region. The term fell into disuse and by the time of the Doomsday Book in the 11th century the word did not appear in any translation from the Latin.

The modern form of the word with its connotations of scenery appeared in the late 16th century when the term landschap was introduced by Dutch painters when referring to paintings of inland natural or rural scenery.

Paul Gabriel painting

Paul Gabriel A watercourse in Abcoude

According to Jackson (The vernacular landscape, 1986): "From 1577 with Harrison's Description of Britain onwards, a new awareness of the aesthetic nature of landscape emerged as a new kind of topographical writing flourished...". Originally the term was translated landskip which the Oxford English Dictionary referred to as the corrupt form of the word, gradually to be replaced by landscape.

Following a lengthy analysis concentrating on the German term landschaft, Hartshorne (The Nature of Geography, Annals Assoc Am Geog, 29. 1939) defined landscape as referring to "the external, visible, (or touchable) surface of the earth. This surface is formed by the outer surfaces, those in immediate contact with the atmosphere, of vegetation, bare earth, snow, ice, or water bodies or the features made by man."

Hartshorne differentiated the term from region which he considered is larger and more flexible in size. He eliminated sky on the basis that the atmosphere is simply the medium through which the earth's surface is viewed and also excluded underground mine workings, the soil beneath vegetation and rainfall.

However he included moveable objects noting that a view of Broadway without traffic would be incomplete. Hartshorne ignored the inclusion of oceans in landscape. He opposed perception of landscapes by other than sight, e.g. sounds and odours, on the grounds that these do not contribute to a unified concept. In regard to the concept of natural and cultural landscapes that Sauer among others differentiated, Hartshorne stated "the natural landscape ceased to exist when man appeared on the scene". While admitting the term primeval landscape could refer to pre-human landscapes he considered the present natural landscape is "a theoretical concept which never did exist".

During the 1920s and 1930s, attempts were made to construct methodologies that made landscape analysis the essential if not exclusive task of geography. This stemmed from Carl Sauer's view that the role of geography was to systematically examine the "phenomenology of landscape". Sauer viewed landscapes broadly as areas comprising distinct associations of forms, both physical and natural, and regarded landscape study as tracing the development of natural landscapes into cultural landscapes.

By the 1940s, this emphasis had passed as geographers found that the difficulties associated with reconstructing the past were forbidding and at odds with their primary concern with the present world. The concept of a natural landscape became increasingly questioned with knowledge of human impact on the environment. More recent geographers have addressed the subjective attributes of a place within humanistic geography thus crossing the bridge between the objective and the subjective assessment of an area.

Top of next column

The popular conception of the landscape that is reflected in dictionaries conveys a particular and a general meaning; the particular referring to an area of the earth's surface and the general meaning being which can be seen by an observer.

With greater attention to the environmental perception by psychologists over recent decades, landscape is regarded as the raw material with which to study human perceptions and the human processing of information. Thus Daniels & Cosgrove (The Iconography of Landscape, 1988) defined landscape, not in physical terms but reflected it as an outward expression of human perception:

"a landscape is a cultural image, a pictorial way of representing, structuring or symbolising surroundings."

Meinig combined the physical and the psychological in a wonderful image:

"any landscape is composed not only of what lies before our eyes but what lies within our heads."

(The beholding eye; ten versions of the same scene. Landscape Architecture, 66, 1976).

In recent decades the term environment has gained wide usage. Jay Appleton (The Experience of Landscape, 1975) distinguished environment from landscape by referring to the latter as "the environment perceived".

An advantage which the term environment has over landscape is, as Bourassa noted (The Aesthetics of Landscape, 1991), that environment can refer more readily to urban scenes although the term urban landscape is also in common usage. As the term environment embraces the total physical, biological, cultural and aesthetic components of an area, it is generally regarded as too broad and encompassing a term for landscape

The term landscape aesthetics or just aesthetics is frequently used in the literature. Aesthetics has a more controversial origin than landscape. It derived from the Greek aisthesis meaning "sense perception".

The term was used as the title of the book Aesthetica (1750-58) by Alexander Baumgarten (1714 – 62), a minor German philosopher who incorrectly applied the Greek term to a critique of the beautiful or the theory of taste.

Thus the term which originally applied to the broad field of sense perception was restricted to the area of taste. Immanuel Kant in 1781 criticised this use and applied it in accordance with its classical meaning - "the philosophy of sensuous perception" (Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology, 1966).

However, the corrupted term aesthetics gained popular acceptance entering England after 1830 and, according to the OED, within a century of the coining of the meaning by Baumgarten, it was in wide use throughout Europe.

The dictionary define aesthetic as "things perceptible by the senses as opposed to things thinkable or immaterial" (Shorter Oxford Dictionary, 1973), "pertaining to the sense of the beautiful or the science of aesthetics" (Macquarie Dictionary, 1981), or "of relating to, or dealing with aesthetics or the beautiful" (Websters Dictionary, 1973).

Aesthetics is regarded as a branch of philosophy, that which "deduces from nature and taste the rules and principles of art, the theory of the fine arts; the science of the beautiful..." (Macquarie) or "[that] dealing with the nature of the beautiful and with judgements concerning beauty" (Websters).

Thus landscapes have often been the subject of inquiry within the broad framework of aesthetics in the quest for understanding of beauty.

Deep Harbor

Deep Harbor Creek, Fleurieu Peninsula




Go to top


Scenic resources are valuable to the community in many ways.

Recreation and tourism

View tourism promotional literature of virtually any place and the area’s scenic quality is presented as a major attraction. A century ago, it was estimated that Switzerland gained between US$10,000 – $40,000 per square mile from its scenery per year. What is it today?

Barossa scene

Barossa scene

In terms of the expenditure of visitors it attracts, the Barossa Valley region in South Australia is worth A$55,000 per square km annually or around $150/sq km per day, a fair proportion of it due to the attractiveness of its landscape (Lothian, 2005b). Annual visitation by 20 million people to the Lake District in England is worth £441,500/sq km.

Quality of life

Landscapes contribute to the quality of life in a similar way as art, music, cultural activities and a host of other activities which provide enjoyment for participants and fulfillment for practitioners.

Cable beach

Cable Beach, Broome

Contribution to land values

Houses built in locations with a good view fetch a higher price, other features being equal, than houses without the view. There have been many studies quantifying this value. These indicate that a good view will add 10 – 15% to the property value – translated this can mean hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Gold coast

Gold Coast, Queensland

Psychological value


Feathertop, Bright, Victoria

Soaking in a beautiful landscape is therapeutic, relaxing, fulfilling. Taking a holiday amidst lovely landscapes allows one to absorb it and be regenerated through the experience.

Image of a country

When overseas, Australians boast of the beauty of their country, its beaches and coast, its outback and even its cities. A glance in a bookshop reveals dozens of books, calendars, videos, and other publications about Australia with landscapes featured prominently. Australian writers and poets have waxed lyrical about Australia's landscapes (see Love of Landscape). Poets such as Wordsworth, Coleridge and Southey together with the painters Turner, Constable and Girtin transformed the image of the Lake District to the English in the 18th century.


Grassmer, Lake District, England

Although Australians are sometimes embarrassed by its politicians, its sports people and other exports, Australians are always proud about their country's landscape image.

A significant economic, environmental & social resource

Scenic quality has value to the community and should be recognised as a significant resource in its own right. Planners, engineers, councils and others often pay lip service to the beauty of their area and include in their planning and development documents high sounding words about the importance of its beauty but do little to actually measure, map and manage it.

Phillip Island

Phillip Island, Victoria

Top of next column

Everybody needs beauty as well as bread, place to play in and pray in, where Nature may heal and cheer and give strength to body and soul alike. John Muir

Go to Love of Landscape

Go to top


© 2009-14 Scenic Solutions   Privacy   Terms of Service   Site Map   Contact us